<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vista Blues &#8212; Literally</title>
	<atom:link href="http://curiouschap.com/2007/12/vista-blues-literally/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://curiouschap.com/2007/12/vista-blues-literally/</link>
	<description>Thoughts and Rants on Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 01:12:45 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Dain</title>
		<link>http://curiouschap.com/2007/12/vista-blues-literally/comment-page-1/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Dain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.curiouschap.com/?p=47#comment-270</guid>
		<description>Interesting, and thanks for the post on my blue article! I know that highlight color is selectable in macs, but there is no mouseover color. I don&#039;t see why they added it, and it does seem gratuitous. Not as gratuitous as all these gradients, though. Seriously, selected in mac is solid, will there be some gradient backlash someday that the pseudo 3-D look gets a bit tiresome when used everywhere?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, and thanks for the post on my blue article! I know that highlight color is selectable in macs, but there is no mouseover color. I don&#8217;t see why they added it, and it does seem gratuitous. Not as gratuitous as all these gradients, though. Seriously, selected in mac is solid, will there be some gradient backlash someday that the pseudo 3-D look gets a bit tiresome when used everywhere?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
